X benchmarks 2026
Where do accounts stand on X? The reference engagement rate, the best-performing formats and the observed posting rhythm, from recent public studies.
The formats that work on X
Median engagement rate by format, by reach (Buffer).
- Observed rhythm on X: 9 posts per month (Buffer, citing Rival IQ).
- Replying to comments is associated with +8% engagement on X, each account compared with itself (Buffer).
The two figures are not comparable: each study divides by a different base (reach, followers, views or impressions).
What it means for you
- These figures are reference points, not targets: your audience has its own rhythm.
- The gap between formats matters more than the overall figure: try the ones that win on X.
- Sofia compares each post with your own past results, not with a global average.
Still have a question?
Answers to the questions we hear most.
ContactA question or a demo? The team answers quickly.Why do studies give different numbers?
Because they don't divide by the same thing: reach, followers, views or impressions. They don't observe the same accounts or the same period either. Every number on this page names its base and its source.
Do these numbers apply to my account?
They are medians and averages across thousands of accounts. They give an order of magnitude; your real benchmark remains your own posts, compared with one another.
When was this data collected?
Every source is dated at the bottom of the page, with a link to the original study. The numbers are reviewed with each new edition.
- BufferThe State of Social Media Engagement in 2026Published March 5, 2026 · 52M posts analysed
- Buffer2026 Social Media BenchmarksPublished January 7, 2026
Figures checked on each publisher's page on September 21, 2026. Studies get updated: check on their site.
Stop guessing, start measuring
Sofia prepares your posts in the formats that work, at the times your customers are around, and learns from your own results.